Pages

Showing results for Supraglottic Airways >> LMA - Classic (Total results = 68)

Sorted by date of publication.
Prospective, randomized comparison of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients.
Genzwuerker HV Fritz A Hinkelbein J Finteis T Schlaefer A Schaeffer M Thil E Rapp HJ
Paediatric anaesthesia, 11/2006, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 17121555
Training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in an airway management manikin.
Micaglio M Doglioni N Parotto M Zanardo V Ori C Trevisanuto D
Paediatric anaesthesia, 9/2006, Journal Article
PMID: 16972830
[Clinical study of the laryngeal mask in paediatric. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-classic].
Bordes M Semjen F Meymat Y Zaghet B Suriray I Cros AM
Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 5/2006, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16675186
A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
Hanning SJ McCulloch TJ Orr B Anderson SP
Anaesthesia and intensive care, 4/2006, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16617647
The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K Roettger C Wulf H
Anesthesia and analgesia, 1/2006, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16428533
Comparison of the re-usable LMA Classic and two single-use laryngeal masks (LMA Unique and SoftSeal) in airway management by novice personnel.
Tan MG Chin ER Kong CS Chan YH Ip-Yam PC
Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1/2006, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16398378
A comparison of the Soft Seal disposable and the Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway.
Shafik MT Bahlman BU Hall JE Ali MS
Anaesthesia, 1/2006, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16430570
Middle ear pressure changes during anesthesia with or without nitrous oxide are similar among airway devices.
Hohlrieder M Keller C Brimacombe J Eschertzhuber S Luckner G Abraham I von Goedecke A
Anesthesia and analgesia, 12/2005, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16368850
[Comparison of two different laryngeal mask models for airway management in patients with immobilization of the cervical spine].
Gernoth C Jandewerth O Contzen M Hinkelbein J Genzwürker H
Der Anaesthesist, 12/2005, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16328475
[Use of the size 3 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Results of a randomized crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway].
Goldmann K Roettger C Wulf H
Der Anaesthesist, 11/2005, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16270215
A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children.
Lopez-Gil M Brimacombe J Garcia G
British journal of anaesthesia, 10/2005, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16210311
Propofol concentration requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion was highest with the ProSeal, next highest with the Fastrach, and lowest with the Classic type, with target-controlled infusion.
Handa-Tsutsui F Kodaka M
Journal of clinical anesthesia, 8/2005, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 16102683
A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients.
Goldmann K Jakob C
Anesthesia and analgesia, 5/2005, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15920181
Comparison of fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic and single-use laryngeal mask airways.
Danha RF Thompson JL Popat MT Pandit JJ
Anaesthesia, 1/2005, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15644018
Comparison of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously ventilating adult patients.
Cao MM Webb T Bjorksten AR
Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1/2005, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15675213
Cardiovascular changes after extraglottic airway insertion: a prospective, randomized comparison between the laryngeal mask or the new PAXpress.
Casati A Vinciguerra F Spreafico E Marchetti C Putzu M Siliotti R Mondello E
Journal of clinical anesthesia, 9/2004, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15374554
Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
Shimbori H Ono K Miwa T Morimura N Noguchi M Hiroki K
British journal of anaesthesia, 8/2004, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15298876
Comparison of cuff-pressure changes in LMA-Classic and the new Soft Seal laryngeal masks during nitrous oxide anaesthesia in spontaneous breathing patients.
van Zundert AA Fonck K Al-Shaikh B Mortier EP
European journal of anaesthesiology, 8/2004, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15318467
Randomized evaluation of the single-use SoftSeal and the re-useable LMA Classic laryngeal mask.
Paech MJ Lain J Garrett WR Gillespie G Stannard KJ Doherty DA
Anaesthesia and intensive care, 4/2004, Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15058123
Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
Van Zundert AA Fonck K Al-Shaikh B Mortier E
Anesthesiology, 10/2003, Clinical Trial, Evaluation Studies, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 14576541

Pages

Want to see more results per page?[10 per page] [20 per page] [50 per page]